<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for 20lbcat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://20lbcat.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://20lbcat.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 04:33:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Miss Information by Miss Information &#124; From the Woodshed</title>
		<link>http://20lbcat.com/2009/08/24/miss-information/#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Information &#124; From the Woodshed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 04:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://20lbcat.com/?p=151#comment-1277</guid>
		<description>[...] first, then harmony, then melody. Then I revised the melody a few months ago. The title came from my first encounter with a Paul Krugman article. I wanted to write a musical satire of the proliferation of fallacies through the media, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first, then harmony, then melody. Then I revised the melody a few months ago. The title came from my first encounter with a Paul Krugman article. I wanted to write a musical satire of the proliferation of fallacies through the media, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recruitment Bonanza by randy lahey</title>
		<link>http://20lbcat.com/2010/09/09/recruitment-bonanza/#comment-662</link>
		<dc:creator>randy lahey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 07:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://20lbcat.com/?p=197#comment-662</guid>
		<description>That part that bugged me most was that people kept telling Pastor Jones that he woud endanger U.S. troops if he burned the books. Are they not already in danger?

This guy better stop going back and forth on whether he&#039;s going to do it. If he doesn&#039;t do it now he&#039;s a giant pussy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That part that bugged me most was that people kept telling Pastor Jones that he woud endanger U.S. troops if he burned the books. Are they not already in danger?</p>
<p>This guy better stop going back and forth on whether he&#8217;s going to do it. If he doesn&#8217;t do it now he&#8217;s a giant pussy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recruitment Bonanza by 20lbcat</title>
		<link>http://20lbcat.com/2010/09/09/recruitment-bonanza/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>20lbcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 07:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://20lbcat.com/?p=197#comment-661</guid>
		<description>It makes no difference to me who was in charge when invasions started. My point is that it&#039;s absurd to assert that some book-burning will have any significant impact on terrorist recruitment while the US military is &lt;em&gt;still&lt;/em&gt; over there killing people. Whether those killed are actual bad guys or &quot;alleged militants&quot; or &quot;suspected insurgents&quot; or civilians, they are all real people, with friends and families who are rightfully really pissed off at the killers. I suspect one wouldn&#039;t have to be religious at all to achieve the mindset of a suicide bomber when one&#039;s community has been destroyed by some foreign entity that can&#039;t be held responsible.

Here&#039;s another of those bigger bonanzas: &lt;a href=&quot;http://afghanistan.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/09/army-12-soldiers-killed-afghans-mutiliated-corpses/?hpt=T2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Army: 12 soldiers killed Afghans, mutiliated corpses&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes no difference to me who was in charge when invasions started. My point is that it&#8217;s absurd to assert that some book-burning will have any significant impact on terrorist recruitment while the US military is <em>still</em> over there killing people. Whether those killed are actual bad guys or &#8220;alleged militants&#8221; or &#8220;suspected insurgents&#8221; or civilians, they are all real people, with friends and families who are rightfully really pissed off at the killers. I suspect one wouldn&#8217;t have to be religious at all to achieve the mindset of a suicide bomber when one&#8217;s community has been destroyed by some foreign entity that can&#8217;t be held responsible.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another of those bigger bonanzas: <a href="http://afghanistan.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/09/army-12-soldiers-killed-afghans-mutiliated-corpses/?hpt=T2" rel="nofollow">Army: 12 soldiers killed Afghans, mutiliated corpses</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Recruitment Bonanza by patty</title>
		<link>http://20lbcat.com/2010/09/09/recruitment-bonanza/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>patty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 22:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://20lbcat.com/?p=197#comment-660</guid>
		<description>last i checked, obama wasn&#039;t president when the united states invaded iraq, pakistan or afghanistan. i can understand his concerns about not wanting to make a fubar situation even worse.

and i know you know better about how religious zealots function. as perplexed as religion makes me, i understand that to devout muslims, setting the quran aflame isn&#039;t something to take lightly. it&#039;s the same reason why westboro baptist church exists. and why iraqis choose to burn the american flag.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>last i checked, obama wasn&#8217;t president when the united states invaded iraq, pakistan or afghanistan. i can understand his concerns about not wanting to make a fubar situation even worse.</p>
<p>and i know you know better about how religious zealots function. as perplexed as religion makes me, i understand that to devout muslims, setting the quran aflame isn&#8217;t something to take lightly. it&#8217;s the same reason why westboro baptist church exists. and why iraqis choose to burn the american flag.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Distinction Between Corporate and Human Speakers by patty</title>
		<link>http://20lbcat.com/2010/01/21/the-distinction-between-corporate-and-human-speakers/#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>patty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://20lbcat.com/?p=177#comment-343</guid>
		<description>i should clarify that to me, small business is a sole proprietorship or partnership, one that exists maybe through debt financing but not investments. no board to answer to.

teach me the uke now, please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i should clarify that to me, small business is a sole proprietorship or partnership, one that exists maybe through debt financing but not investments. no board to answer to.</p>
<p>teach me the uke now, please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Target the Legislators by patty</title>
		<link>http://20lbcat.com/2010/01/22/target-the-legislators/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>patty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 19:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://20lbcat.com/?p=179#comment-342</guid>
		<description>joe! first and foremost, i want to let you know how much i wish we were having this conversation in person! i miss you a lot.

you&#039;ve made some excellent points, but i stand by my statement that corporations act solely in the best interest of their shareholders. that&#039;s why they have those shareholders meetings. shareholders elect the board, the board hires the president/ceo. ultimately, if the president/ceo isn&#039;t bringing in the profits, they get canned. BUT! this also leads me to why i&#039;m going to the premiere socially-conscious business school in existence today. the power is with the consumer. if they don&#039;t like where a company is headed, they can chop the head off the beast. if they want profits AND sustainability (and i&#039;m speaking in a larger sense than just environmentally), then the corporation is OBLIGATED to find a way to do so.

it&#039;s this same side of the coin that has me worried though. not enough people are concerned that we are running out of resources. it&#039;s still profits over people and planet. until people see that it&#039;s their contribution to this system that is going to destroy our quality of life, i&#039;m not confident that corporations should be allowed to speak with their money in the political sphere. as a nation where we all get one vote, i don&#039;t see the equity in allowing corporations to push their way to the front of the line. so ideal world: educated, aware consumers/stockholders who dictate that profits are not separate from sustainability and corporations who act in accordance. but even if we&#039;re ever able to achieve this, i don&#039;t think corporations should have such a stronghold on politics.

un beso,
patty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>joe! first and foremost, i want to let you know how much i wish we were having this conversation in person! i miss you a lot.</p>
<p>you&#8217;ve made some excellent points, but i stand by my statement that corporations act solely in the best interest of their shareholders. that&#8217;s why they have those shareholders meetings. shareholders elect the board, the board hires the president/ceo. ultimately, if the president/ceo isn&#8217;t bringing in the profits, they get canned. BUT! this also leads me to why i&#8217;m going to the premiere socially-conscious business school in existence today. the power is with the consumer. if they don&#8217;t like where a company is headed, they can chop the head off the beast. if they want profits AND sustainability (and i&#8217;m speaking in a larger sense than just environmentally), then the corporation is OBLIGATED to find a way to do so.</p>
<p>it&#8217;s this same side of the coin that has me worried though. not enough people are concerned that we are running out of resources. it&#8217;s still profits over people and planet. until people see that it&#8217;s their contribution to this system that is going to destroy our quality of life, i&#8217;m not confident that corporations should be allowed to speak with their money in the political sphere. as a nation where we all get one vote, i don&#8217;t see the equity in allowing corporations to push their way to the front of the line. so ideal world: educated, aware consumers/stockholders who dictate that profits are not separate from sustainability and corporations who act in accordance. but even if we&#8217;re ever able to achieve this, i don&#8217;t think corporations should have such a stronghold on politics.</p>
<p>un beso,<br />
patty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Distinction Between Corporate and Human Speakers by 20lbcat</title>
		<link>http://20lbcat.com/2010/01/21/the-distinction-between-corporate-and-human-speakers/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>20lbcat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://20lbcat.com/?p=177#comment-341</guid>
		<description>Hi Patty!

I wrote most of my response in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://20lbcat.com/2010/01/22/target-the-legislators/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;separate post&lt;/a&gt;.

On the taxes, I was careful to say &quot;potentially crippling taxes.&quot; If I&#039;m barely in the black, then introducing any taxes at all could indeed cripple my operation.

Also, where is the line between a small business and a corporation? You seem to see a distinct one. I don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Patty!</p>
<p>I wrote most of my response in a <a href="http://20lbcat.com/2010/01/22/target-the-legislators/" rel="nofollow">separate post</a>.</p>
<p>On the taxes, I was careful to say &#8220;potentially crippling taxes.&#8221; If I&#8217;m barely in the black, then introducing any taxes at all could indeed cripple my operation.</p>
<p>Also, where is the line between a small business and a corporation? You seem to see a distinct one. I don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Distinction Between Corporate and Human Speakers by patty</title>
		<link>http://20lbcat.com/2010/01/21/the-distinction-between-corporate-and-human-speakers/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>patty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://20lbcat.com/?p=177#comment-339</guid>
		<description>hmm, will have to largely disagree with you on this one, joseph. corporations are solely obligated to act in the best interest of their stockholders. that means make them a shit ton of money and screw over the environment, developing countries, and human rights among other things. where an individual is easily prosecuted for acts against their fellow man, corporations have an unfair advantage - usually the result of lining the pockets of their legislators.

not to say all corporations are doing this. if the growing amount of CSRs are any indication, corporations are learning that they can&#039;t fuck over people for long and get away with it. but those corporations, the ones who genuinely abide by the UN&#039;s Global Compact for example, are by far the minority. the traditional big-wig corporation is still ruling the world, but more and more are disguising themselves as socially responsible companies when they are anything but (monsanto being a prime suspect). THIS IS NOT GOOD.

while i highly respect (and am quite envious of) your geetar skillz, i don&#039;t think you will start a corporation of guitar instructors. small business, maybe. and seeing my own father be the sole proprietor of his own business for over 20 years, i can say with full confidence that &quot;crippling taxes&quot; never came into play, so i doubt you will have to worry about that either.

much love,
patty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm, will have to largely disagree with you on this one, joseph. corporations are solely obligated to act in the best interest of their stockholders. that means make them a shit ton of money and screw over the environment, developing countries, and human rights among other things. where an individual is easily prosecuted for acts against their fellow man, corporations have an unfair advantage &#8211; usually the result of lining the pockets of their legislators.</p>
<p>not to say all corporations are doing this. if the growing amount of CSRs are any indication, corporations are learning that they can&#8217;t fuck over people for long and get away with it. but those corporations, the ones who genuinely abide by the UN&#8217;s Global Compact for example, are by far the minority. the traditional big-wig corporation is still ruling the world, but more and more are disguising themselves as socially responsible companies when they are anything but (monsanto being a prime suspect). THIS IS NOT GOOD.</p>
<p>while i highly respect (and am quite envious of) your geetar skillz, i don&#8217;t think you will start a corporation of guitar instructors. small business, maybe. and seeing my own father be the sole proprietor of his own business for over 20 years, i can say with full confidence that &#8220;crippling taxes&#8221; never came into play, so i doubt you will have to worry about that either.</p>
<p>much love,<br />
patty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Most Dangerous Thing in the World by poop</title>
		<link>http://20lbcat.com/2009/11/22/the-most-dangerous-thing-in-the-world/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>poop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://20lbcat.com/?p=173#comment-208</guid>
		<description>I think bloggers are the most dangerous things in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think bloggers are the most dangerous things in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Find the Victim by 20lbCatisthesonofDog</title>
		<link>http://20lbcat.com/2009/10/27/find-the-victim/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>20lbCatisthesonofDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://20lbcat.com/?p=171#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Uhhhh... Raul Ibanez? Pedro Martinez?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhhhh&#8230; Raul Ibanez? Pedro Martinez?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

